Both Core- and Shell-Cross-Linked Nanogels: Photoinduced Size Change, Intraparticle LCST, and Interparticle UCST Thermal Behaviors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New thermal- and photoresponsive core-shell nanogel particles were obtained from self-assembly in aqueous solution of a double-hydrophilic block copolymer (DHBCP) of which the two blocks could be photo-cross-linked via the reversible photodimerization and photocleavage of coumarin moieties. The diblock copolymer, consisting of poly[N,N-dimethylacrylamide-co-4-methyl-[7-(methacryloyl)oxyethyloxy]coumarin] and poly[N-isopropylacrylamide-co-4-methyl-[7-(methacryloyl)oxyethyloxy]coumarin] (P(DMA-co-CMA)-b-P(NIPAM-co-CMA)), was synthesized by using reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization. At T > LCST of the P(NIPAM-co-CMA) block, core-shell micelles were formed and UV light irradiation at λ > 310 nm resulted in cross-linking of both the micelle core of P(NIPAM-co-CMA) and the micelle shell of P(DMA-co-CMA); subsequent cooling of the solution to T < LCST gave rise to water-soluble, swollen nanogel particles. Upon UV light irradiation at λ < 260 nm, the decrease of cross-linking density could increase the swelling of nanogel particles by ∼23% in diameter. By alternating irradiation with the different wavelengths, the average hydrodynamic diameter of nanogel particles was tunable between ∼58 and ∼47 nm. Interestingly, upon further cooling of the solution, aggregation occurred for nanogel particles with a moderate cross-linking density (10%-40% dimerization of coumarin moieties). Therefore, such core- and shell-cross-linked nanogel could display both "intraparticle" LCST (solubility of polymer chains forming the core) and "interparticle" UCST (solubility of particles). The possible mechanism and the effect of dimerization degree on the UCST behavior were discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".