Adaptive wave field synthesis with independent radiation mode control for active sound field reproduction: Theory
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sound field reproduction finds applications in music or audio reproduction and experimental acoustics. For audio applications, sound field reproduction can be used to artificially reproduce the spatial character of natural hearing. The general objective is then to reproduce a sound field in a real reproduction environment. Wave field synthesis (WFS) is a known open-loop technology which assumes that the reproduction environment is anechoic. For classical WFS, the room response thus reduces the quality of the physical sound field reproduction. In this paper, adaptive wave field synthesis (AWFS) is analytically investigated as an adaptive sound field reproduction system combining WFS and active control with a limited number of reproduction error sensors to compensate the response of the listening environment. The primary point of this paper is the definition of AWFS. Therefore, the fundamental behavior of AWFS is illustrated by analytical considerations and simple free-field simulation results. As demonstrated, AWFS is fundamentally related to WFS and “Ambisonics.” The paper introduces independent adaptive control of sound field reproduction on the basis of radiation modes, via the singular value decomposition of the transfer impedance matrix. Possible practical independent control of radiation modes for AWFS is discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it