MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986626478 · doi:10.1063/1.1527707

Polarized photoreflectance spectra of excitonic polaritons in a ZnO single crystal

2002· article· en· W1986626478 on OpenAlexaff
Shigefusa F. Chichibu, T. Sota, G. Cantwell, D. B. Eason, C. W. Litton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStrong Light-Matter Interactions
Canadian institutionsEaglePicher (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolaritonExcitonPhotoluminescenceExcited stateOscillator strengthExciton-polaritonsCondensed matter physicsCrystal (programming language)Valence (chemistry)Spectral lineSingle crystalGround stateAtomic physicsMaterials scienceMolecular physicsPhysicsOptoelectronicsNuclear magnetic resonance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exciton–polariton structures in a high-quality bulk ZnO single crystal were resolved at 8 K by means of polarized photoreflectance (PR) and photoluminescence measurements. The energies of the PR resonances corresponded to those of the upper and lower exciton–polariton branches, where A, B, and C excitons couple simultaneously to an electromagnetic wave. Longitudinal-transverse splitting of ground-state exciton polaritons and resonances due to the first excited states of respective excitons were observed due to the large oscillator strength. Photoluminescence peaks due to the corresponding polarion branches were clearly resolved. The valence-band ordering was confirmed to be A-Γ9v, B-Γ7vu, and C-Γ7vl.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations126
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicStrong Light-Matter InteractionsFrench-language works237,207