MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Algorithms for combining menstrual and ultrasound estimates of gestational age: consequences for rates of preterm and postterm birth

2002· article· en· W1986646606 on OpenAlexaffabout
Béatrice Blondel, Isabelle Morin, Robert W. Platt, Michael S. Kramer, Robert Usher, Gérard Bréart

Bibliographic record

VenueBJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
KeywordsMedicineGestational ageObstetricsUltrasoundPregnancyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We compared rates of preterm and postterm birth according to six algorithms for gestational age (GA) estimates based on last menstrual period (LMP) and early ultrasound (EUS): LMP alone, LMP if the discrepancy between the two estimates was within 14 days and otherwise EUS (14-day rule), a 10-day rule, a seven-day rule, a three-day rule and EUS alone. In a sample of 44,623 births in a Canadian tertiary hospital, the choice of algorithms makes a substantial impact on both preterm and postterm birth rates, even when EUS was used for discrepancies over two weeks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.412

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations89
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & GynaecologySame topicBirth, Development, and HealthFrench-language works237,207