MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986663752 · doi:10.1063/1.1430734

Large eddy simulation of the effects of mild swirl on the near field of a round free jet

2002· article· en· W1986663752 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsBraidTurbulenceJet (fluid)MechanicsVorticityLarge eddy simulationEntrainment (biomusicology)Classical mechanicsFlow (mathematics)Plane (geometry)Field (mathematics)VortexGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The near fields of turbulent round free jets with swirl numbers of S=0.0 and 0.24 are modeled with large eddy simulations that use a dynamic Smagorinsky subgrid scale model. The time-averaged results are in accordance with other numerical and experimental data. Instantaneous plots of vorticity are used to examine the evolution of and interaction between coherent structures. Ring structures aligned with the plane normal to the flow form downstream of the jet shear layer and collide with the streamwise braid structures. The resulting interaction cause the rings to break apart into smaller, less organized turbulence structures. The addition of swirl increases the number of streamwise braids, which enhances the breakdown mechanism of the rings. The results suggest that the increased entrainment observed in swirling flows is due to the action of the braids rather than the rings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it