Intra-Abdominal Haemorrhage due to Traumatic Rupture of a Hepatic Cyst and Parenchymal Cystic Wall Laceration Following Blunt Abdominal Injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intra-abdominal haemorrhage due to traumatic rupture of a hepatic cyst is sometimes fatal. Rupture of a hepatic cyst without bleeding does not necessarily need any surgical intervention or vice versa. However, a ruptured hepatic cyst accompanied by parenchymal hepatic laceration potentially leads patients to a lethal status, because of delayed intra abdominal haemorrhage. Furthermore, the patient was under warfarin therapy and even small lacerations may lead to significant bleeding and subsequent laparotomies. Therefore, close observation is important for patients whose hepatic cyst is ruptured, albeit without any signs of simultaneous haemorrhage on arrival. This is the case of an 87-year-old woman who had a road traffic accident and whose hepatic cyst was ruptured without simultaneous haemorrhage. The following morning, she demonstrated haemorrhagic shock. A subsequent CT scan revealed intra abdominal haemorrhage, and bleeding from the biggest hepatic cyst. Immediately, she underwent emergency surgery under the pringle manoeuvre, inferior vena cava (IVC) total clamping, and venovenous bypass (VVB) from the femoral vein to the internal jugular vein. The patient soon became systemically well. Generally, occlusion of hepatic inflow and infra hepatic IVC are crucial for control of hepatic and behind hepatic IVC bleeding. Furthermore, in order to avoid instability due to IVC total clamping, it is important to execute VVB especially for pulmonary hypertension or cardiomyopathy patients. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/jmc1429w
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".