MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986700976 · doi:10.5539/mas.v9n3p133

Combustion Synthesis of TiN-BN Nanostructured Composite Powder with the Use of Sodium Azide and Precursors of Titanium and Boron

2015· article· en· W1986700976 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
А. П. Амосов, Lyudmila Aleksandrovna Shiganova, Г. В. Бичуров, Irina Kerson

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced materials and composites
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
KeywordsTinMaterials scienceComposite numberBoronCombustionSelf-propagating high-temperature synthesisTitaniumSinteringTitanium powderMachinabilityMetallurgyCeramicChemical engineeringComposite materialMicrostructureChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The composite powder of TiN-BN is of interest from the point of view of the use for sintering the TiN-BN composite ceramics, which compared with TiN ceramics would have less britlleness, better machinability and good tribological properties. Possibility of obtaining a composite powder of TiN-BN with the application of process of combustion synthesis (CS) or self-propagating high-temperature synthesis (SHS) from powder mixtures of sodium azide and halide salts KBF4, NH4BF4, (NH4)2TiF6 and Na2TiF6 as precursors of titanium and boron was investigated. It was shown that these mixtures are capable of burning and obtaining agglomerated composite powders. TiN-BN powder with an admixture of KF is formed only in combustion of

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicAdvanced materials and compositesFrench-language works237,207