MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986780705 · doi:10.1309/feyd99txc4lmyva5

p120 Catenin Reduction and Cytoplasmic Relocalization Leads to Dysregulation of E-Cadherin in Solid Pseudopapillary Tumors of the Pancreas

2008· article· en· W1986780705 on OpenAlexaff
Runjan Chetty, Dhanpat Jain, Stefano Serra

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCadherinCytoplasmPathologyPancreasCateninStainingBiologyTissue microarrayImmunohistochemistryCellCancer researchCell biologyMedicineEndocrinologyWnt signaling pathwaySignal transductionGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs) of the pancreas have characteristic morphologic features and show consistent beta-catenin abnormalities and loss of E-cadherin protein. The loss of cell-to-cell adhesion is thought to contribute to frequent cystic degeneration and pseudopapillae formation. p120 regulates E-cadherin and is responsible for its degradation.A tissue microarray of 20 cases and whole sections from another 9 cases of SPT were stained with p120, beta-catenin, and E-cadherin. All 29 cases showed cytoplasmic and nuclear staining for beta-catenin, loss of E-cadherin, and decrease or loss of p120 membrane localization but cytoplasmic staining instead. Loss of membrane p120 staining with relocalization to the cytoplasm was seen in cystic and solid areas of the tumors. This study indicates that p120 expression in SPTs is abnormal and loss of E-cadherin is probably consequent on p120 loss or decrease. Aberrations and other alterations of the E-cadherin gene are unlikely to be responsible for the loss of E-cadherin in SPTs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.504

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Clinical PathologySame topicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchFrench-language works237,207