MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986788154 · doi:10.3828/eir.2013.20.2

Invitations and Withdrawals: Queer Romantic Ecologies in William Blake's <i>The Book of Thel</i> and John Clare's "The Nightingale's Nest"

2013· article· en· W1986788154 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEssays in Romanticism · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMoravian Church and William Blake
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRomanceQueerNest (protein structural motif)ArtArt historyPsychoanalysisBiologyPsychologyLiteratureBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Through close readings of William Blake's Book of Thel (1789) and John Clare's The Nightingale's Nest (1833), this article examines the concept of ecology, attending both to how these poems explore queerly ethical imperatives posed by the world and to the ways in which desires surface, in these poems, as fissures in their ecological imaginaries. Patterns of invitation and withdrawal in both texts confront the reader with their desirous, enmeshed, yet alienated relation to an inherently other world. Blake's and Clare's poems engage their readers in both a desire to enter an enclosed space, a habitat, and a recognition of the enclosure of that space as a textual effect—ecologically, these texts open out and destabilize a moment in which the human becomes aware of its interdependent relation to the nonhuman. As such, both poems trouble ecocritical tendencies to postulate queer and Romantic as ethical terms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.512
Threshold uncertainty score0.591

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it