Fast two-frame multiscale dense optical flow estimation using discrete wavelet filters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A multiscale algorithm with complexity O(N) (where N is the number of pixels in one image) using wavelet filters is proposed to estimate dense optical flow from two frames. Hierarchical image representation by wavelet decomposition is integrated with differential techniques in a new multiscale framework. It is shown that if a compactly supported wavelet basis with one vanishing moment is carefully selected, hierarchical image, first-order derivative, and corner representations can be obtained from the wavelet decomposition. On the basis of this result, three of the four components of the wave let decomposition are employed to estimate dense optical flow with use of only two frames. This overcomes the "flattening-out" problem in traditional pyramid methods, which produce large errors when low-texture regions become flat at coarse levels as a result of blurring. A two-dimensional affine motion model is used to formulate the optical flow problem as a linear system, with all resolutions simultaneously (i.e., coarse-and-fine) rather than the traditional coarse-to-fine approach, which unavoidably propagates errors from the coarse level. This not only helps to improve the accuracy but also makes the hardware implementation of our algorithm simple. Experiments on different types of image sequences, together with quantitative and qualitative comparisons with several other optical flow methods, are given to demonstrate the effectiveness and the robustness of our algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".