MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986812928 · doi:10.1097/hcr.0000000000000054

The Association Between Sleep Disturbance, Depressive Symptoms, and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Cardiac Rehabilitation Participants

2014· article· en· W1986812928 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Health and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePsychosocialSleep disorderDepression (economics)Quality of life (healthcare)RehabilitationLogistic regressionClinical psychologyDepressive symptomsAnthropometrySleep (system call)PsychiatryPhysical therapyInsomniaCognitionInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Brief PURPOSE: Recent guidelines from the Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation highlight the importance of addressing sleep disturbance among participants of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs. The primary objective of this study was to examine the relationship between depressive symptoms, health-related quality of life, and sleep disturbance in CR participants. The secondary objective was to estimate the prevalence of sleep disturbance among CR participants with and without depressive symptoms and explore demographic, medical, and psychological predictors of poor sleep quality. METHODS: Cardiac rehabilitation participants (N = 259) were included in this study. Participants completed a standardized questionnaire package including demographic, health-related, and psychosocial measures. Physiologic and anthropometric measurements were taken at baseline. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables, and data were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Poor sleep quality was reported by 52% of participants in the sample, and 47% of participants in the sample reported experiencing at least mild depressive symptoms. Poor sleep occurred more often in individuals with depressive symptoms, and after adjustment for medical factors and health-related quality of life, participants with symptoms of depression were still more likely to experience sleep disturbance than those without depressive symptoms (OR = 2.80; 95% CI, 1.37–5.77). An important gender difference emerged in the relationship between symptoms of depression and sleep disturbance. CONCLUSION: Among participants of a CR program, disturbed sleep was strongly associated with depressive symptoms and decreased health-related quality of life. Results demonstrate the importance of sleep evaluation in CR programs. The primary objective of this study was to examine the relationship between depressive symptoms, health-related quality of life, and sleep disturbance among cardiac rehabilitation participants. Results demonstrated that depressive symptoms were the most significant determinant of poor sleep, even after controlling for medical factors and health-related quality of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it