MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1986833610 · doi:10.1109/fpt.2014.7082781

Gigabyte-scale alignment acceleration of biological sequences via Ethernet streaming

2014· article· en· W1986833610 on OpenAlexaff
Theepan Moorthy, Sathish Gopalakrishnan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceField-programmable gate arrayEthernetAccelerationSpeedupHardware accelerationParallel computingSmith–Waterman algorithmComputer hardwareReal-time computingEmbedded systemSequence alignment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe the design of a PC-to-FPGA data streaming platform that enables hardware acceleration of gigabyte scale input data. Specifically, the acceleration is an FPGA implementation of the Dialign Algorithm, which performs both global and local alignment of query biological sequences against relatively larger reference strands of biological sequences. Earlier implementations of this algorithm could not be scaled to handle gigabyte-length reference sequences, nor megabyte-length query sequences, due to the inherent limitations of available memory and logic on single-FPGA platforms. We solve these issues via the design of an Ethernet channel to stream the reference sequence, and describe the novel use of SATA based Solid State Drives (SSDs) to time multiplex the FPGA logic into handling larger query sequences as well. In doing so, this paper also presents a general method to achieve gigabyte-depth FIFOs on commercially available FPGA development boards. This benefits data-intensive acceleration even outside of the bioinformatics application domain. Through the development of our acceleration logic and careful coupling of the required IO peripherals, we have successfully demonstrated a processing time of 28.61 minutes for a 200 base-pair query-sequence aligned against a 1 GB reference-sequence, a rate that is limited only by SATA 2 SDD write speeds. The present runtime offers a 38× speedup (18.36 hours down to 28.61 minutes) compared to standalone PC based processing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies→French-language works237,207→