MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986846157 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2012.6334879

Finite element approach for performances prediction of a small synchronous generator using ANSYS software

2012· article· en· W1986846157 on OpenAlexaff
M. A. Khalf, R. Wamkeue, Davide Aguglia

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité du QuébecUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransient (computer programming)Finite element methodGenerator (circuit theory)Rotor (electric)Computer sciencePermanent magnet synchronous generatorSalientFault (geology)Line (geometry)SoftwareSynchronous motorSteady state (chemistry)Control theory (sociology)EngineeringMechanical engineeringVoltageStructural engineeringElectrical engineeringMathematicsPhysicsPower (physics)GeometryArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents a finite element (FE) based efficient analysis procedure for very small three-phase synchronous machines. Two FE formulation approaches are proposed to achieve this goal: the magnetostatic and the non-linear transient time stepped formulations. This combination allows us to predict the steady-state and the transient performance at no-load and in the case of a line-to-line short circuit fault. The method is successfully applied for replication and modeling of a small 120-VA, 4-salient pole, 208-V and 60-Hz, wound rotor laboratory synchronous generator. The closeness of FE simulated and experimental results greatly attest to the effectiveness of the proposed FE based small-generator modeling framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.570
Threshold uncertainty score0.281

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMagnetic Properties and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207