MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986887151 · doi:10.3917/rai.026.0083

Républicanisme, immigration et design institutionnel

2007· article· fr· W1986887151 on OpenAlexaff
Christian Nadeau

Bibliographic record

VenueRaisons politiques · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Refugees, and Integration
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesImmigrationPhilosophySociologyPolitical scienceEthnologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Cet article vise deux objectifs. D'une part, soutenir la thèse selon laquelle la question des fondements moraux de l'immigration sélective est mal posée si elle ne part pas d'une réflexion sur les modalités institutionnelles assurant un rapport positif entre migrants et communauté d'accueil. D'autre part, cet article présentera un argument défendant le rôle de la théorie républicaine de la liberté politique comme cadre normatif pour penser les problèmes structurels liés à l'immigration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRaisons politiquesSame topicMigration, Refugees, and IntegrationFrench-language works237,207