Social capital and urban environments in Southeast Asia: <i>Lessons from settlements in Bangkok and Ho Chi Minh City</i>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
At its core, social capital research assumes that all communities may contribute to superior governance given enhanced social connections, trust and reciprocity. While researchers and policy makers have looked to social capital as a solution to varying local governance challenges, there still remain significant questions about how social capital may be translated into concrete outcomes. This paper focuses on the relationship between social networks and community connections in urban environments in Southeast Asia to examine whether communities with strong social capital are more able to participate in projects designed to improve environmental management in two of the region's most polluted cities, Bangkok and Ho Chi Minh City, especially in marginalised and low-income neighbourhoods. A comparative analysis of household survey data focuses on the relationship between income and community participation and develops an index comprised of different dimensions of social capital. The findings imply that there ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it