MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986929460 · doi:10.1109/isspa.2012.6310662

EIT system and reconstruction algorithm adapted for skin cancer imaging

2012· article· en· W1986929460 on OpenAlexaff
Alzbeta E. Hartinger, R. Guardo, Hervé Gagnon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrical impedance tomographyFinite element methodIterative reconstructionComputer scienceReconstruction algorithmAlgorithmElectronic circuitBiomedical engineeringTomographyElectrical impedanceMedical imagingProof of conceptElectronic engineeringComputer visionArtificial intelligenceEngineeringOpticsElectrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To support early diagnosis of skin cancer and minimize the risk of developing metastases, electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a promising technique. EIT is a bio-medical technique for imaging the electrical conductivity distribution of a body segment. The aim of this study is to adapt an EIT system for skin cancer screening. A 3-D finite element model (FEM) of the skin was first developed. This model was used to study the electrical behavior of cutaneous layers and identify the operating frequencies to properly discriminate malignant from benign lesions. Simulated data obtained with the FEM model were used to develop image reconstruction algorithms for visualizing and discriminating skin lesions. Furthermore, according to the specifications obtained from the model, electronic circuits and a handheld probe incorporating a disposable 16-electrode array were designed and built. The system and reconstruction algorithms were validated in vitro and measurements showed great correlation with simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectrical and Bioimpedance TomographyFrench-language works237,207