MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986987074 · doi:10.3354/ame044115

Remarkably diverse and contrasting archaeal communities in a large arctic river and the coastal Arctic Ocean

2006· article· en· W1986987074 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueAquatic Microbial Ecology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology
Canadian institutionsCenter for Northern StudiesUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsArcticCrenarchaeotaBiodiversityEcologyOceanographyArchaeaAcartiaGeographyBiologyGeologyCrustacean

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AME Aquatic Microbial Ecology Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsSpecials AME 44:115-126 (2006) - doi:10.3354/ame044115 Remarkably diverse and contrasting archaeal communities in a large arctic river and the coastal Arctic Ocean Pierre E. Galand1,*, Connie Lovejoy1, Warwick F. Vincent2 1Département de Biologie et Québec-Océan, and 2Département de Biologie et Centre d’études nordiques, Université Laval, Québec G1K 7P4, Canada *Email: pierre.galand@bio.ulaval.ca ABSTRACT: Although the microbial biodiversity of arctic seas has received an increasing amount of attention, little is known about the microbial communities of its inflowing rivers. In this study we examined the molecular diversity of Archaea in the largest arctic river in North America, the Mackenzie River, and in the adjacent coastal Beaufort Sea (Canadian Arctic) during maximum open water conditions (October 2002). The Mackenzie River 16S rRNA clone libraries revealed a remarkably diverse assemblage of archaeal sequences, with an estimated 286 phylotypes defined as sequences with 97% similarity. These grouped mainly within 2 phylogenetic clusters, and were related to sequences earlier retrieved from flooded soils and sediments previously named RC-V and LDS. The marine coastal libraries were of very different composition to those of river libraries and were dominated by Group II Euryarchaeota followed by Group I Crenarchaeota. These coastal assemblages had greater archaeal diversity (18 to 23 phylotypes) than previously reported for marine communities elsewhere, and differed from previously described central Arctic Ocean assemblages. This may reflect the heterogeneous mixture of organic substrates and particles available for microbial heterotrophy in arctic coastal waters and the use of an alternative primer pair (109f-915r) in this study. The coastal sequences grouped within typical marine clusters, and we therefore conclude that they were an active autochthonous community rather than one derived from the large inflowing river. These results underscore the rich microbial diversity in arctic rivers and their adjacent coastal marine ecosystems. KEY WORDS: Taxonomic diversity · Archaea · SSU rDNA · Canadian Arctic · RFLP · Cloning Full text in pdf format PreviousNextExport citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in AME Vol. 44, No. 2. Online publication date: September 12, 2006 Print ISSN: 0948-3055; Online ISSN: 1616-1564 Copyright © 2006 Inter-Research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.432
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it