MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987029726 · doi:10.1097/pas.0b013e3181758831

Endocervical Adenocarcinomas With Ovarian Metastases

2008· article· en· W1987029726 on OpenAlexaff
Brigitte M. Ronnett, Anna Yemelyanova, Russell Vang, C. Blake Gilks, Dianne Miller, Patti E. Gravitt, Robert J. Kurman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsVancouver General Hospital
FundersJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
KeywordsMedicineCervixMetastasisOvaryAdenocarcinomaOccultOvarian tumorPathologyOvarian cancerInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most endocervical adenocarcinomas ( approximately 90%) are high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV)-related neoplasms, with the remainder being unrelated to HPV; both types infrequently metastasize to the ovaries. Clinicopathologic features of 29 cases of synchronous and metachronous endocervical and ovarian tumors (26 HPV-related, 3 unrelated to HPV) were analyzed. In 18 cases, the cervical tumors were clearly invasive; these included 5 clinically evident tumors diagnosed before the ovarian metastases (immediately preoperatively to 7 y), 11 clinically unsuspected tumors diagnosed concurrently in specimens obtained for evaluation of ovarian/pelvic masses, 1 case with concurrent clinically evident cervical and ovarian masses, and 1 clinically occult tumor diagnosed subsequent to the ovarian metastasis. In 11 cases, the cervical tumors were more limited; these included 5 tumors comprised predominantly of adenocarcinoma in situ with small foci of superficial invasion ("microinvasive carcinomas") diagnosed before the ovarian metastases (3 mo to 7 y) and 6 tumors comprised of extensive adenocarcinoma in situ lacking unequivocally recognizable stromal invasion diagnosed before (9 mo to 7 y, n=4), concurrently with (n=1), or subsequent to (n=1) the ovarian metastases. Fifteen cervical tumors involved lower uterine segment corpus endometrium or endomyometrium, including 4 tumors that were minimally invasive or not recognizably invasive in the cervix. The ovarian tumors ranged in size from 2.1 to 30.0 cm (mean/median=12.7/13.5); they were unilateral in 19 cases (65.5%) and 12 of these were unilateral and 10 cm or greater. In 26 cases, including the 19 unilateral tumors, the ovarian tumors exhibited "borderlinelike," confluent glandular, cribriform, and/or villoglandular patterns simulating primary ovarian atypical proliferative (borderline) tumors or well-differentiated carcinomas; these patterns were pure in 24 and admixed with minor infiltrative foci in 2. The ovarian tumors had features typical of metastases (bilateral and infiltrative) in only 3 cases. In all HPV-related cases the paired endocervical and ovarian tumors contained identical HPV types, establishing the ovarian tumors as metastases. Endocervical adenocarcinomas, including microinvasive forms and some not recognizably invasive, have the potential to metastasize to the ovaries; extension into the lower uterine segment/corpus endometrium may be a risk factor, with retrograde uterine/transtubal spread as a possible mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.360

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations171
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Surgical PathologySame topicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207