Optical switching of vanadium dioxide thin films deposited by reactive pulsed laser deposition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The parameters of reactive pulsed laser deposition were successfully optimized for fabrication of vanadium dioxide thin films. It is observed that the O2 concentration in Ar gas and the total deposition pressure are critical in stabilizing the single VO2 phase. Thermochromic VO2 and V1−xWxO2 (x=0.014) thin films were synthesized on various substrates (silicon, quartz, and sapphire) at 5% of O2/Ar ratio gas and total pressure of 90 mTorr. The structural properties of the deposited films were analyzed by x-ray diffraction, while their semiconductor-to-metal phase transitions were studied by electrical resistivity using the four-point technique and infrared transmittance from room temperature up to 100 °C. The observed transition temperature was about 36 °C for W-doped VO2 compared to 68 °C for VO2 films. This transition temperature was then lowered by about 22.85 °C per 1 at. % of W added. The temperature coefficient of resistance was about 1.78%/°C for VO2 and about 1.90%/°C for W-doped VO2. Using the pump-probe experiment, the application of these thermochromic films as optical switches was demonstrated at the wavelength of 1.55 μm. The transmission switching was about 25 dB for VO2 and 28 dB for W-doped VO2. In addition, application of VO2 on optical fiber components was demonstrated by direct VO2 coating on the end faces of cleaved single mode optical fibers and optical fiber connectors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".