MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987045046 · doi:10.1159/000178904

Oral Testosterone, a Reappraisal

2008· article· en· W1987045046 on OpenAlex
P Daggett, M.J. Wheeler, J. D. N. Nabarro

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHormone Research · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal and reproductive studies
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTestosterone (patch)Oral administrationAndrogenMedicineAbsorption (acoustics)Oral doseInternal medicineEndocrinologyPhysiologyHormoneMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A microparticulate form of free testosterone was given orally to 6 hypogonadal men. Plasma levels were followed after a 200-mg dose, and a double-peak effect was observed. This suggests that particles of different sizes were absorbed at different rates. The clinical and biochemical effects were observed over a 2-month period, on a dose of 200 mg twice daily, taken in place of the usual androgen replacement. The results indicate that absorption is not sufficiently reliable for routine use. The large doses required to achieve therapeutic levels, make oral administration of free testosterone impractical.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.737
Threshold uncertainty score0.930

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.252
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it