Structure of the defect perovskite Ce<sub>1/3</sub>NbO<sub>3</sub>: a redetermination by electron and neutron powder diffraction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The crystal structure of the defect perovskite Ce1/3NbO3, cerium niobium oxide, has been re-examined by neutron powder and electron diffraction. The results of a powder neutron Rietveld refinement indicate that the structure is monoclinic: space group P2/m with Z = 4, a = 5.5267 (3), b = 7.8824 (2), c = 5.5245 (3) A, beta = 90.294 (1)degrees, V= 240.67 (2) A3 at 298 K with chi2 = 2.570. Previous reports have described the Ce1/3NbO3 structure in a smaller (V/2) orthorhombic cell based solely upon X-ray powder diffraction data. The presence of weak reflections in the electron diffraction pattern provides conclusive evidence for a monoclinic superstructure of the orthorhombic cell. While these superlattice reflections are barely detectable with X-ray radiation, they are clearly visible in the neutron diffraction experiments. The superlattice reflections are shown to arise from a tilting of the NbO6 octahedra which results in the reduction of symmetry from orthorhombic to monoclinic. It is also found that the Ce3+ and Nb5+ cations are displaced from the centres of their respective polyhedra to accommodate the bond-valence requirements of the crystal structure. It is likely that distortions of this type are present in other Ln1/3NbO3 and Ln1/3TaO3 defect perovskites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it