MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987092734 · doi:10.1592/phco.22.13.1163.33512

Development and Validation of a Survey to Assess Barriers to Drug Use in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure

2002· article· en· W1987092734 on OpenAlexaff
Scot H. Simpson, Jeffrey Johnson, Karen B. Farris, Ross T. Tsuyuki

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedication Adherence and Compliance
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Health EconomicsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAmbulatoryScale (ratio)Family medicineGerontologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scot H. Simpson, Pharm.D., M.Sc., Jeffrey A. Johnson, Ph.D., Karen B. Farris, Ph.D., and Ross T. Tsuyuki, Pharm.D., M.Sc. Objective. To report the development of and initial experience with a survey designed to assess patient-perceived barriers to drug use in ambulatory patients with heart failure. Methods. The Barriers to Medication Use (BMU) survey, developed from previous qualitative work by our group, was administered to 128 consecutive patients attending an outpatient heart failure clinic. The first 42 patients to return the survey were mailed a second survey to evaluate response stability over time. The survey contained 31 questions in five barrier domains (knowledge, previous drug therapy experiences, social support, communication, and relationship with health care professionals). Patients also completed the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLHF) questionnaire and a self-reported drug use scale. Frequency of drug refills was used to estimate adherence. Reliability and construct validity of the BMU survey were assessed using correlation coefficients. Results. Response rates were 89% and 93% for the first and retest surveys, respectively The BMU survey showed modest internal consistency in the overall survey and in two of the five barrier domains. Responses to the first and retest surveys showed good stability over time in the overall survey and in four of the five barrier domains. Patients with good adherence reported few barriers; however, the association was not strong (Pearson correlation coefficient r = -0.14, p=0.14). Patients who reported few barriers also reported better MLHF scores (r = 0.42, p < 0.001), with the strongest association in the social support domain (r = 0.53; p < 0.001). All respondents reported having a good relationship with health care professionals. The most common barriers to drug use were poor support networks and previous adverse reactions. Conclusion. The BMU survey demonstrated reasonable reliability and validity characteristics in this first clinical experience. Despite high adherence, patients still reported barriers that may hinder optimal drug use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug TherapySame topicMedication Adherence and ComplianceFrench-language works237,207