MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1987108435 · doi:10.1118/1.3612264

SU‐E‐T‐313: Ionization Chamber Measurements in a Small, Non‐Uniform Beam ‐ Applications for Synchrotron Beam Dosimetry

2011· article· en· W1987108435 on OpenAlexaffabout
Danielle Anderson, Brad Warkentin, Albert Siegbahn, B. G. Fallone

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIonization chamberBeamlineDosimetryBeam (structure)OpticsMaterials scienceDetectorDose profileCalibrationIon beamLaser beam qualityBeam diameterIon sourcePhysicsIonizationIonNuclear medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: The aim of this ongoing work is to develop a dosimetric method suitable for the biomedical beamlines at the Canadian Light Source (CLS), which offer novel imaging and therapy modalities. As a step in this process, we analyzed the response of a clinical, cylindrical ionization chamber to small, non‐uniform synchrotron beams to determine absolute dose rates in air based on clinical calibration factors obtained under broad‐beam conditions.Methods: Three detectors (Gafchromic EBT2 film, Capintec PR06C ion chamber, and PTW diamond detector) were used to determine the vertical profile of the filtered beam produced by the CLSˈs bending magnet beamline. The radial response function of the ion chamber was determined using a 100 micrometer slit beam. Matlab code incorporated this information to predict the relative ion chamber output as a function of nominal vertical beam collimation (0.1 – 8.7 mm) for both stationary and scanning ion chamber geometries. The beam‐size dependent output was also measured directly with the ion chamber.Results: The beam profile was Gaussian in shape, and measurements with all three detectors were in substantive agreement. The ion chamber response function showed the walls and inner electrode of the chamber. Predicted and measured values for the ion chamber response with varying field size were in excellent agreement for both the scanning and stationary measurements, validating the MATLAB algorithm. Based on the algorithm and using an interpolated clinical calibration factor, the dose rates for the filtered bending magnet beam ranged from 1.7 – 1.9 Gy/s at the maximum CLS storage ring current Conclusions: The excellent agreement between the predicted and measured results provides confidence that the developed model of ion chamber response to the small, non‐uniform beam is valid and suggests that absolute dose rates can be measured accurately using clinical ion chambers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Physics→Same topicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques→French-language works237,207→