Pharmacologic analysis of the mechanism of dark neuron production in cerebral cortex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dark neurons have plagued the interpretation of brain tissue sections, experimentally and clinically. Seen only when perturbed but living tissue is fixed in aldehydes, their mechanism of production is unknown. Since dark neurons are seen in cortical biopsies, experimental ischemia, hypoglycemia, and epilepsy, we surmised that glutamate release and neuronal transmembrane ion fluxes could be the perturbation leading to dark neuron formation while the fixation process is underway. Accordingly, we excised biopsies of rat cortex to simulate neurosurgical production of dark neurons. To ascertain the role of glutamate, blockade of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and non-NMDA receptors was done prior to formaldehyde fixation. To assess the role of transmembrane sodium ion (and implicitly, water) fluxes, tetraethylammonium (TEA) was used. Blockade of NMDA receptors with MK-801 and non-NMDA receptors with the quinoxalinediones (CNQX and NBQX) abolished dark neuron formation. More delayed exposure of the tissue to the antagonist, CNQX, by admixing it with the fixative directly, allowed for some production of dark neurons. Aminophosphonoheptanoate (APH), perhaps due to its polarity, and TEA, did not prevent dark neurons, which were abundant in control formaldehyde fixed material unexposed to either receptor or ion channel antagonists. The results demonstrate a role for the pharmacologic subtypes of glutamate receptors in the pathogenetic mechanism of dark neuron formation. Our results are consistent with the appearance of dark neurons in biopsy where the cerebral cortex has been undercut, and rendered locally ischemic and hypoglycemic, as well as in epilepsy, hypoglycemia, and ischemia, all of which lead to glutamate release. Rather than a pressure-derived mechanical origin, we suggest that depolarization, glutamate release or receptor activation are more likely mechanisms of dark neuron production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".