Identifying domains of ideas to influence early childhood teachers’ beliefs in globalisation: a mixed-method study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the age of globalisation, it has been understood that teachers’ beliefs revolve between old–new and local–foreign ideas of teaching and learning. The purpose of this study is to identify the domains of the various ideas that influence teachers’ beliefs in globalisation, compare them to the strengths of influence, and explore the meanings of influence. A mixed-methods research methodology is adopted to use both quantitative and qualitative analysis to triangulate the findings. In total, 216 early childhood teachers in Singapore participated. The findings identify four domains of clustered ideas: pedagogy and advocacy, school, personal, and global. We discuss the findings and suggest an integrated teacher education programme to promote teachers’ recursive thinking between old–new and local–foreign ideas in globalisation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it