MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987135370 · doi:10.2202/1934-2640.1278

Judicial Culpability for War and Genocide in the Age of American Empire

2008· article· en· W1987135370 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bruce A. Clark

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Jurist · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Law and Human Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmpireLawRule of lawPolitical scienceGenocideDemocracyConstitutionPoliticsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For legal purposes, the American empire was inaugurated in the 1870s with the invasion and occupation by the USA (and Canada) of the national territories of the Indians of North America, and continues with the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq.The prevention of empire and, correspondingly, of war and genocide pursuant to empire, depends upon establishing the rule of law, responsibility for which constitutionally is vested in the judicial branch of government.Its job is to uphold constitutional democracy under the rule of law against political usurpation of the People's exclusive sovereign power over constitutional change secured by the Article V Amendment Formula.Instead it has politicized itself, not only in terms of excusing usurpation by Congress and the President, but also in terms of the "living tree" approach to the constitution which permits judicial pruning and splicing as an alternative to Article V.One consequence is unconstitutional empire, war and genocide which, directly concerning the life of the People, is the definitive legal issue for testing the existence of the rule of law and, by extension, of democracy under the rule of law.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.020
Scholarly communication0.0100.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0080.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal JuristSame topicInternational Law and Human RightsFrench-language works237,207