MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987135458 · doi:10.1021/la900131g

Polyvinylamine−Phenylboronic Acid Adhesion to Cellulose Hydrogel

2009· article· en· W1987135458 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLangmuir · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSynthesis and properties of polymers
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhenylboronic acidCelluloseAdhesionSelf-healing hydrogelsChemistryPolymer chemistryPolymer scienceChemical engineeringOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pairs of wet, regenerated cellulose films were laminated with polyvinylamine derivatized with phenylboronic acid (PVAm-PBA), and the forces required to delaminate the never-dried laminates were measured as functions of adhesive structure and application conditions. The greatest wet adhesion was obtained with 150 kDa PVAm, with 16% of the amines bearing phenylboronic moieties. The pH at which the PVAm-PBA was adsorbed onto the cellulose was the dominant process parameter. High adsorption pH gave high concentrations of adsorbed adhesive and the maximum adhesion. The specific role of the phenyl boronic groups was illustrated two ways: (a) replacing the B(OH)(2) with OH (i.e., phenol) gave much lower adhesion, and (b) wet adhesion was greatly reduced by the presence of sorbitol, which effectively competes with cellulose for boronate-binding sites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it