MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987156544 · doi:10.1139/b07-133

Genetic diversity of<i>Frankia</i>strains in root nodules from<i>Hippophae¨ rhamnoides</i>L.

2008· article· en· W1987156544 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lihong Chen, Jian Liu, Gui-min Yao, Wei Yan

Bibliographic record

VenueBotany · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLegume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Food and Drug Safety EvaluationNatural Science Foundation of Inner MongoliaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsFrankiaHippophae rhamnoidesBiologyActinorhizal plantGenetic diversityRestriction fragment length polymorphismBotanyRoot noduleIntergenic regionSymbiosisGeneticsPolymerase chain reactionGeneBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Hippophae¨ rhamnoides L. – Frankia symbiosis is of ecological and practical importance, but very little is known about H. rhamnoides-infective Frankia strains. To address this problem, we have used PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) analysis of nifD–nifK intergenic spacer (IGS) to estimate their genetic diversity at 19 sites in Northern China. Restriction analysis indicated that H. rhamnoides-infective Frankia had a high genetic diversity; the samples were divided into nine RFLP patterns (A–I). Elevation and precipitation likely affect the distribution of different Frankia patterns in root nodules. The patterns A and D were present in relatively large areas, which were located at various elevations; however, the distribution of patterns B, C, E, F, G, H, and I generally followed a geographic range. The richness of Frankia diversity was influenced by plant cover and geographic factors such as elevation and precipitation. H. rhamnoides cover had a higher diversity than that of natural vegetation cover. The center part of the geographical range, with intermediate elevation and precipitation, had a higher level of Frankia diversity than that of the west part and east part with high or low elevations and precipitations, respectively. The nifD–nifK IGS regions were sequenced from 28 nodule samples. Phylogenetic analysis showed that H. rhamnoides-infective Frankia strains were all clustered with the Elaeagnus group, and the diversity of this group was quite extensive. Phylogenetic relationships between Hippophae¨ and Elaeagnus-infective Frankia strains were relatively close to each other. Although not very close to either Hippophae¨- or Elaeagnus-infective Frankia strains, Shepherdia -infective strain SCN10a was closer to Hippophae¨-infective strains than to Elaeagnus- infective strains. This is the first detailed report on the genetic diversity and phylogenetic analysis of H. rhamnoides-infective Frankia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBotanySame topicLegume Nitrogen Fixing SymbiosisFrench-language works237,207