MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987167381 · doi:10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.11.1949

Bone Mineralization in Polyostotic Fibrous Dysplasia: Histomorphometric Analysis

2002· article· en· W1987167381 on OpenAlexaff
Leonieke Terpstra, Frank Rauch, Horacio Plotkin, Rose Travers, Francis H. Glorieux

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bone and Mineral Research · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Children's Hospital
FundersKoninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen
KeywordsPolyostotic fibrous dysplasiaFibrous dysplasiaMineralization (soil science)MedicineChemistryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fibrous dysplasia (FD) of bone can be complicated by renal phosphate wasting. The effect of hypophosphatemia on normal and dysplastic bone of FD patients has not been well characterized. In this study, we compared serum phosphorus (sPi) levels to histomorphometric findings in 27 iliac bone samples from 23 children and adolescents (aged 4.2-16.4 years) with polyostotic FD. The samples were separated into two groups, based on the presence (n = 10) or absence (n = 17) of a dysplastic lesion within the specimen. Histomorphometric results were compared with those from 18 age-matched control subjects without metabolic bone disease. In dysplastic lesions, trabeculae were clearly thinner and increased in number. Osteoid indices, osteoblast surface per bone surface, and mineralization lag time were elevated in dysplastic areas, but there was no detectable effect of sPi concentrations on these indices. In nondysplastic bone tissue, low sPi levels were associated with mildly increased osteoid thickness and prolonged mineralization lag time. None of the 13 patients in whom hand X-rays were available at the time of biopsy had radiological signs of rickets. In conclusion, low sPi can cause a mild systemic mineralization defect in FD, but the more severe mineralization defect seen in dysplastic lesions is independent of sPi levels. It is debatable whether the mild systemic mineralization defect warrants treatment with oral phosphorus supplementation if signs of rickets are absent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Bone and Mineral ResearchSame topicBone health and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207