MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987195357 · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2014.2332534

Nonlinear Inversion of Microwave Scattering Data for Snow-Covered Sea-Ice Dielectric Profile Reconstruction

2014· article· en· W1987195357 on OpenAlexafffund
Nariman Firoozy, Puyan Mojabi, David G. Barber

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaArcticNet
KeywordsSea iceSnowInversion (geology)ScatteringRadarNonlinear systemGeologyInverse problemInverse scattering problemMicrowaveRemote sensingMicrowave imagingBistatic radarAlgorithmRadar imagingComputer scienceOpticsPhysicsMathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A nonlinear electromagnetic inverse scattering algorithm is presented to reconstruct snow-covered sea-ice dielectric profiles using multiple-frequency multipolarimetric normalized radar cross-sectional data. This inversion algorithm utilizes a global optimization technique in conjunction with the boundary-perturbation-theory electromagnetic forward solver to retrieve the complex permittivities, thickness values, and roughness parameters of the snow-covered sea-ice profiles of interest. The proposed algorithm is then tested against synthetically collected data in both bistatic and monostatic configurations. The achievable quantitative accuracy of the inversion results is reasonable as long as sufficient scattering data are given to the inversion algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing LettersSame topicSoil Moisture and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207