Photophysical and electrochemical properties and temperature dependent geometrical isomerism in alkyl quinacridonediimines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quinacridone diimines 1–10 were synthesized by the condensation of anilines with alkyl substituted quinacridones (QA). Photophysical and electrochemical properties of the compounds were investigated. Unconventional behavior of absorption spectra suggested a decrease in π_conjugation within the QA skeleton as well as lack of extended π_conjugation between the QA skeleton and the N-phenyl rings. A computational study of compounds 1–10, a variable temperature 1H NMR study of compounds 2, 7 and 10 (for instance), and single crystal X-ray analysis of 2, 3, 6, 7, 8 and 10 indicated that the anomalous behavior is due to the buckled, non-planar structure of the quinacridones. Moreover the molecules existed in two interconvertible geometric isomeric forms at different temperatures. Molecular orbital calculations were performed at B3LYP/6-31+G(d), B3PW91/6-31G(d) and PBEPBE/6-31G(d) levels of theory at B3PW91/6-31G(d) optimized structures for both isomers of all compounds (1–10); the results obtained are in close agreement with the experimentally determined values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".