MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987222495 · doi:10.1287/opre.1080.0532

Dynamic Control of a Make-to-Order, Parallel-Server System with Cancellations

2008· article· en· W1987222495 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOperations Research · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAdvanced Queuing Theory Analysis
Canadian institutionsKellogg's (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutsourcingComputer scienceQueueing theoryContext (archaeology)Holding costMathematical optimizationScheduling (production processes)Operations researchOrder (exchange)Resource allocationControl (management)Distributed computingComputer networkBusinessMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Motivated by make-to-order production systems, we consider a dynamic control problem for a multiclass, parallel-server queueing system. The production system serves multiple classes of customers who require rigid due-date lead times and may cancel their order subject to a cancellation penalty. To meet the due-date constraints, a system manager may outsource orders when the backlog of work is judged excessive, thereby incurring outsourcing costs. The system manager strives to minimize long-run average costs by dynamically making outsourcing and resource allocation decisions. Under heavy-traffic conditions, the scheduling problem is approximated by a Brownian control problem. Interpreting the solution of the Brownian control problem in the context of the original queueing system, a nongreedy outsourcing and resource allocation policy is proposed. A simulation experiment is performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of this policy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.265
Threshold uncertainty score0.608

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it