Group 13 and Lanthanide Complexes with Mixed <i>O</i>,<i>S</i> Anionic Ligands Derived from Maltol
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Four mixed O,S binding ligand precursors derived from maltol (3-hydroxy-2-methyl-4-pyrone) have been chelated to gallium(III), indium(III), and lanthanide(III) ions to yield a series of metal complexes. The four ligand precursors include two pyranthiones, 3-hydroxy-2-methyl-4-pyranthione, commonly known as thiomaltol (Htma), and 2-ethyl-3-hydroxy-4-pyranthione, commonly known as ethylthiomaltol (Hetma), and two pyridinethiones, 3-hydroxy-2-methyl-4(H)-pyridinethione (Hmppt) and 3-hydroxy-1,2-dimethyl-4-pyridinethione (Hdppt). Dimeric forms of the pyridinethiones, Hmppt dimer and Hdppt dimer, were also isolated and characterized. Complete characterization of the monomeric organic compounds is reported including acidity constants and crystal structures of Htma, Hetma, and Hdppt dimer. Reacting the four monomeric ligand precursors with Ga(3+) and In(3+) ions yielded new tris(bidentate ligand) complexes. X-ray-quality crystals of the fac isomer of Ga(tma)(3) were also obtained. New complexes with a range of lanthanides (Ln(3+)) were also synthesized with the two pyranthiones, Htma and Hetma. The synthesis reactions yielded complexes of the type LnL(3).xH(2)O and LnL(2)(OH).xH(2)O, as indicated by elemental analysis and spectroscopic evidence such as mass spectral data and IR and NMR spectra.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it