MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987253469 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2014.6900956

A fuzzy logic system for demand-side load management in residential buildings

2014· article· en· W1987253469 on OpenAlexaff
Azim Keshtkar, Siamak Arzanpour

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermostatDemand responseLoad managementFuzzy logicComputer scienceElectricityLoad balancing (electrical power)Energy managementWirelessDemand sideLoad shiftingEnergy (signal processing)EngineeringElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsEnvironmental economicsGrid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Participating in demand response has significant advantages for both consumers and electricity producers, i.e., saving on high electricity prices for the user, and helping utilities in peak load curtailment. In this paper, a new concept based on fuzzy logic for demand-side load management in residential buildings is presented. The proposed fuzzy logic rule-based algorithm is developed for four important factors: current outdoor temperature, current load demand, current electricity price, and occupant presence. The approach proposed is the result of integration of wireless sensors and fuzzy logic concept. The approach is applied to existing wireless programmable thermostats to add more intelligence for load reduction in residential buildings by considering the input parameters. To gain better understanding, the wireless programmable thermostat is designed and simulated in Matlab GUI as a simulator. The results show that the system by combining the fuzzy rules reduces the temperature (load reduction) which results in better energy management and conservation in heating/cooling systems. Besides, the method is automatically able to help households to decrease their load during peak price and peak load periods. By considering the user activities in the house, it provides occupant's thermal comfort as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.707

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207