Synthesis, Mechanism and Fluorescence Properties of 8-(Aryl)-3-β-D-Ribofuranosylimidazo[2,1-i]purine 5′-Phosphate Derivatives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The synthesis of new fluorescent nucleotides is described. This synthesis comprises two parallel reactions, the Kornblum oxidation and imidazole formation, which lead to 8-(aryl)-3-beta-D-ribofuranosylimidazo[2,1-i]purine 5'-phosphates 2 from AMP or ATP. A detailed mechanism is proposed based on monitoring the reaction by 1H- and 13C-NMR spectroscopy, MS, FAB, HPLC, and pH meter. The spectral and fluorescent properties of the new derivatives at various pH values are described. Excitation and emission maxima for 3 were observed at 290 and 420 nm, respectively, in both basic and neutral media. In acidic media, the emission maximum shifted to 410 nm, however, the fluorescence intensity increased 1.5-fold. ATP analogues 2b and 3b exhibited relative stability regarding hydrolysis by type II ATPDase. Compound 3b is relatively chemically stable at pH 10.4 and 7.4.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".