MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987268974 · doi:10.1139/b08-049

Biosynthesis and potential functions of the ecdysteroid 20-hydroxyecdysone — a review

2008· review· en· W1987268974 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Reginaldo Alves Festucci-Buselli, Luis Antônio Serrão Contim, Luiz C. A. Barbosa, J. J. Stuart, Wagner Campos Otoni

Bibliographic record

VenueBotany · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
KeywordsEcdysteroidBiology20-HydroxyecdysoneBiosynthesisEcdysoneMoultingFunction (biology)BotanyBiochemistryEnzymeHormoneCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ecdysteroid 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E) is a steroid hormone found in arthropods and plants. It is suspected to have agrochemical, biotechnological, medicinal, and pharmaceutical applicability. In insects, 20E controls or elicits molting and other developmental processes, and several characterized P450 enzymes are involved in its biosynthesis. In plants, it may act as a defensive substance against insects and nematodes. It is suspected that 20E, being a physiologically active compound, may affect morphological and physiological processes in plants and that C27phytosterols may be its precursors. However, neither its precise function nor its mechanism of biosynthesis in plants is fully understood. Here, the importance of 20E and current understanding of its structure, potential functions, and biosynthesis in both plants and insects are reviewed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBotanySame topicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchFrench-language works237,207