Expression and subcellular localization of NRAMP1 in human neutrophil granules
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mutations at the Nramp1 gene cause susceptibility to infections with intracellular pathogens. In human blood, polymorphonuclear (PMN) leukocytes are the most abundant site of NRAMP1 messenger RNA (mRNA) expression, suggesting that NRAMP1 plays an important role in the activity of these cells. By Northern blot analysis, NRAMP1 mRNA was only detected in most mature neutrophils from bone marrow (band and segmented cells). A high-affinity polyclonal rabbit antihuman NRAMP1 antibody directed against the amino terminus of the protein was produced and used to study cellular and subcellular localization of the protein in primary human neutrophils. Subcellular fractionation of granule populations together with immunoblotting studies with granule-specific markers indicate that NRAMP1 expression is primarily in tertiary granules. These granules are positive for the matrix enzyme gelatinase and the membrane subunit of the vacuolar H(+)/ATPase and can be recruited for exocytosis by treatment of neutrophils with phorbol myristate acetate. Immunogold studies by cryoelectron microscopy with primary neutrophils confirm that a majority (75%) of NRAMP1-positive granules are also positive for gelatinase, but they also suggest further heterogeneity in this granule population. Presence of NRAMP1 in tertiary granules is in agreement with the late-stage appearance of NRAMP1 mRNA during neutrophil maturation in bone marrow. Finally, immunofluorescence studies of Candida albicans-containing phagosomes formed in neutrophils indicate that NRAMP1 is recruited from tertiary granules to the phagosomal membrane on phagocytosis, supporting a role for NRAMP1 in the antimicrobial defenses of human neutrophils.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".