MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987307216 · doi:10.1139/w08-137

Regulation of pyrimidine formation in<i>Pseudomonas lundensis</i>

2009· article· en· W1987307216 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Thomas P. West

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiochemical and Molecular Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPseudomonasPyrimidineChemistryMicrobiologyBiologyBacteriaBiochemistryStereochemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The regulation of pyrimidine formation in the food spoilage agent Pseudomonas lundensis ATCC 49968 by pyrimidines was examined. In P. lundensis cells grown on glucose as a carbon source, the enzymes aspartate transcarbamoylase, dihydroorotase, and orotidine 5'-monophosphate decarboxylase were induced by orotic acid. Pyrimidine auxotrophs containing reduced transcarbamoylase or orotate phosphoribosyltransferase activity were isolated using chemical mutagenesis and selection procedures. Independent of carbon source, the maximum derepression of enzyme activity was observed for orotidine 5'-monophosphate decarboxylase after pyrimidine limitation of either auxotroph. In the glucose-grown cells of the transcarbamoylase mutant strain, orotic acid induced dihydroorotase and decarboxylase activities. Aspartate transcarbamoylase activity in succinate-grown P. lundensis cells was highly regulated by pyrophosphate as well as by pyrimidine and purine ribonucleotides. It was concluded that pyrimidine formation in P. lundensis was controlled both at the level of de novo pyrimidine biosynthetic enzyme synthesis and at the level of transcarbamoylase activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MicrobiologySame topicBiochemical and Molecular ResearchFrench-language works237,207