MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987334436 · doi:10.1139/e05-006

A database of physical properties of rocks from the Trans-Hudson Orogen, Canada

2005· article· en· W1987334436 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
C MR Fowler, Doug Stead, B. Pandit, Brian William Janser, E. G. Nisbet, G. Nover

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsThe Arctic Eider SocietyUniversity of SaskatchewanSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Research Council CanadaRheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität BonnUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsElectrical resistivity and conductivityGeologyMineralogyArcheanPorositySaturation (graph theory)CrustGraphiteGeophysicsGeochemistryGeotechnical engineeringMetallurgyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A physical properties database of rock types from the Trans-Hudson Orogen provides information for interpretation of geophysical surveys over the Trans-Hudson Orogen. Measurements have been made on 320 samples (all reduced to core) representing metamorphosed Archaean and juvenile Proterozoic orogenic rocks. Water saturated densities were generally between 2600 and 3100 kg m –3 . In most cases, the porosity was < 1%. Except for a few samples, magnetic susceptibility ranged from 20 to 4000 × 10 –6 SI units. P- and S-wave velocities were made under maximum uniaxial stress and triaxial stresses equivalent to depths of ca. 4 km. P- and S-wave velocities measured were 5–7 km s –1 and 3–4 km s –1 , respectively. Electrical resistivity measurements were made at room temperature from 5 Hz to 10 kHz after samples were oven dried and after saturation in solutions with salinity between 0.0 and 1.0 mol/L. Increasing salinity caused a reduction in resistivity. The porosity–resistivity data is in reasonable overall agreement with Archie's Law for all rock types. A minimum value of 50 Ω m was obtained from samples not containing significant sulphide minerals or graphite. For sulphide and graphite-bearing samples, resistivity was as low as 1 Ω m. The resistivity data are consistent with the hypothesis that North American Central Plains (NACP) conductivity anomaly could be due to the presence of graphite- and (or) sulphide-rich bodies or saline pore fluids in the crust. Thermal conductivity measurements made using a "divided-bar" apparatus yielded values between 1 and 5 W m –1 K –1 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.494
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2005
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207