Determination of the Burden of Care in Families of Cardiac Surgery Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"Burden of care" is a term that describes the effects of the multifaceted stressors associated with providing care to an ill family member. Descriptions of burden of care in acute care populations, such as families of patients who have had coronary artery bypass grafting, are very limited. The three purposes of this study were to describe the burden of care in families of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery patients, to compare the burden of care in families grouped by length of stay, and to provide evidence for the validity of the Caregiving Burden Scale in acute care populations. A survey was done using a longitudinal design over the first six weeks following coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. The 124 spouses of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery patients who participated reported a moderate degree of burden in caring for post cardiac surgery family members. Providing emotional support, taking over household tasks, and monitoring patients' conditions created the greatest burden for the participants. Length of stay in hospital did not have an impact on burden of care. The analysis of the data supports the validity of the Care-giving Burden Scale when used in the cardiac surgery population. (Prog Cardiovasc).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".