Investigations on management solutions for golesti reservoir, considering the ecological aspects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nowadays many aquatic ecosystems have become more eutrophic, as anthropic pollution causes the acceleration of eutrophication, which is a slow natural process.Therefore, the cultural eutrophication occurs more rapidly and causes problems in the affected water bodies.Since most of the reservoirs have complex use (fl ood attenuation, generation of hydroelectricity, household and industrial water supply, and irrigation), several models have been already developed to simulate the behavior of eutrophic ecosystems.The objective of this study was to determine the benefi ts of sustainable exploitation of an eutrophic lake.Therefore, the study aims, fi rst, to analyze the trophic level in the lake, and second, to identify the best scenario of reservoir exploitation, in order to avoid the occurrence of eutrophic phenomenon or to minimize this effects.Also, based on the experimental data and an ecological model, the lake stratifi cation and thermocline variation, correlated with operating conditions, have been studied.The study case is represented by a shallow reservoir in Romania, Golesti, which has 55 million m³ volume and a maximum depth of 32 m.Golesti reservoir allows fl ood control, hydropower generation, water supply (household and industrial), and irrigation.Values of infl ow and outfl ow from January 2008 to October 2009 were available for the studied reservoir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".