Characteristics of Starch from Eight Quinoa Lines
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Starches ranging in amylose content from 3 to 20% from eight quinoa ( Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) lines were characterized with respect to thermal, retrogradation, and pasting properties; swelling and solubility behavior; freeze‐thaw stability; water‐binding capacity; shear stability; and granule size and morphology. The starches differed in gelatinization onset temperatures, peak temperatures, and retrogradation tendencies; these characteristics were positively correlated with amylose content. No variation in gelatinization enthalpy was observed. With the exception of pasting temperature, large variations in pasting characteristics were found among starches and were correlated with amylose content. Swelling, solubility, freeze‐thaw stability, and water‐binding capacity also differed among starches and were correlated with amylose content. Granule morphology and size were similar for all starches. The wide variation in amylose content and physicochemical characteristics of quinoa starches suggests applications in a variety of food and nonfood products.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it