MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987397623 · doi:10.1063/1.2360895

Transport in carbon nanotube p-i-n diodes

2006· article· en· W1987397623 on OpenAlexaff
Ken Bosnick, Nathan Gabor, Paul L. McEuen

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCarbon Nanotubes in Composites
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaNational Institute for Nanotechnology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiodeCarbon nanotubeZener diodeQuantum tunnellingMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsNanotubeCarbon nanotube quantum dotBreakdown voltageAvalanche diodeVoltageCondensed matter physicsNanotechnologyPhysicsTransistor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single-walled carbon nanotube diodes are fabricated in a split-gate geometry with electron (n) and hole (p) regions separated by a central region. With the central region gated p or n type the diodes “leak” at low voltages, likely due to tunneling across the smaller depletion region. With the central region intrinsic, nearly ideal diode behavior is observed. Comparison to theory for a one-dimensional diode yields the band gap of the tube and the transmission coefficient through the junction. In reverse bias, the breakdown voltage depends weakly on temperature and nanotube diameter. Comparisons are made to predictions for Zener tunneling and avalanche breakdown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.933

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicCarbon Nanotubes in CompositesFrench-language works237,207