Interactions of Estradiol with Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone and Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone in the Control of Growth Hormone Secretion in the Goldfish
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of testosterone (T) and estradiol (E2) on serum growth hormone (GH) concentrations were investigated throughout the seasonal reproductive cycle of the female goldfish. Gonad-intact female goldfish were implanted intraperitoneally for 5 days with silastic pellets containing no steroid (blank), T(100 micrograms/g) or E2 (25-100 micrograms/g). In blank-implanted females, seasonal variations in serum GH were evident; maximal serum GH levels were found in spring while minimal GH levels were found in summer and early autumn. Implantation of E2-containing silastic capsules stimulated increases (2-4 times control) in serum GH levels throughout the reproductive cycle. Implantation of T did not affect serum GH at any time of the year. One possible mechanism by which E2 could exert its effects may be through alteration of pituitary sensitivity to GH-releasing factors. The decapeptide salmon gonadotropin-releasing hormone (sGnRH) is found in the brain and pituitary of goldfish and stimulates gonadotropin (GTH) and GH secretion. In contrast, thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) stimulates GH, but not GTH, release from pars distalis fragments obtained from sexually regressed (ED50 = 5.7 +/- 3.8 nM; August) or sexually mature (ED50 = 0.53 +/- 0.28 nM; March) fish; in vivo E2 treatment resulted in a 3-fold increase in the in vitro GH response to TRH. Furthermore, E2 treatment increased sGnRH-stimulated GH release by approximately 4-fold. These results demonstrate that E2 but not T stimulates GH secretion throughout the reproductive cycle of female goldfish. Furthermore, sGnRH and TRH stimulate GH release in a teleost, and these stimulatory responses are enhanced by physiological levels of E2.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it