MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987429088 · doi:10.3997/2214-4609.201401941

Heavy Oil Reservoir Characterization Using Vp/Vs Ratios from Multicomponent Data

2007· article· en· W1987429088 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carmen C. Dumitrescu, Laurence R. Lines

Bibliographic record

Venue69th EAGE Conference and Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2007 · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCharacterization (materials science)Reservoir modelingPetroleum engineeringGeologyEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

P301 Heavy Oil Reservoir Characterization Using Vp/Vs Ratios from Multicomponent Data C.C. Dumitrescu* (Sensor Geophysical Ltd) & L. Lines (CHORUS University of Calgary) SUMMARY Vp/Vs is a very good lithology discriminator especially for heavy oil projects. We provide two VpVs ratio volumes based on (i) simultaneous inversion on prestack PP data and (ii) joint inversion of PP and PS poststack data. The new results are compared with the previous results based on the traveltime measurements on the PP and PS components (Lines et al. 2005). The area for this project is a heavy oil field (oil sands of the Devonian-Mississippian

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.652
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue69th EAGE Conference and Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2007Same topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207