MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987451040 · doi:10.1021/jp045044z

Characterization of a Closed-Shell Fluorine−Fluorine Bonding Interaction in Aromatic Compounds on the Basis of the Electron Density

2005· article· en· W1987451040 on OpenAlexaff
Chérif F. Matta, Norberto Castillo, Russell J. Boyd

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicFluorine in Organic Chemistry
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryFluorineHydrogen bondMoleculeLow-barrier hydrogen bondComputational chemistryAtoms in moleculesHydrogenElectronChemical physicsOpen shellChemical bondCrystallographyOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A bond path linking two saturated fluorine atoms is found to be ubiquitous in crowded difluorinated aromatic compounds. The bond path is shown to persist for a range of internuclear distances (2.3-2.8 A) and a range of relative orientations of the two C-F internuclear axes. The F. . .F bonding is shown to exhibit all the hallmarks of a closed-shell weak interaction. The presence of such a bond path can impart as much as 14 kcal/mol of local stabilization to the molecule in which it exists, a stabilization that can be offset or even overwhelmed by destabilization of other regions in the molecule. Several other weak closed-shell interactions were also found and characterized including F. . .C, F. . .O, and C. . .C interactions, hydrogen bonding, dihydrogen bonding, and hydrogen-hydrogen bonding. This study represents another example of the usefulness and richness of the bond path concept and of the theory of atoms in molecules in general.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations168
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicFluorine in Organic ChemistryFrench-language works237,207