Virtual Servers Co-Migration for Mobile Accesses: Online versus Off-Line
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we study the problem of co-migrating a set of service replicas residing on one or more redundant virtual servers in clouds in order to satisfy a sequence of mobile batch-request demands in a cost effective way. With such a migration, we can not only reduce the service access latency for end users but also minimize the network costs for service providers. The co-migration can be achieved at the cost of bulk-data transfer and increases the overall monetary costs for the service providers. To gain the benefits of service migration while minimizing the overall costs, we propose a co-migration algorithmMigkfor multiple servers, each hosting a service replicas.Migkis a randomized algorithm with a competitive cost of$O(\frac{\gamma\, \log \,n}{\min \lbrace \frac{1}{\kappa },\frac{\mu }{\lambda \,+\,\mu }\rbrace })$to migrate$\kappa$services in a static$n$-node network where$\gamma$is the maximal ratio of the migration costs between any pair of neighbor nodes in the network, and where$\lambda$and$\mu$represent the maximum wired transmission cost and the wireless link cost respectively. For comparison, we also study this problem in its static off-line form by proposing a parallel dynamic programming (hereafter DP) based algorithm that integrates the branch&bound strategy with sampling techniques in order to approximate the optimal DP results. We validate the advantage of the proposed algorithms via extensive simulation studies using various requests patterns and cloud network topologies. Our simulation results show that the proposed algorithms can effectively adapt to mobile access patterns to satisfy the service request sequences in a cost-effective way.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".