Textos Manuscrits Culturals de L'època Moderna en Llengua Catalana Existents en la Col·lecció de la Hispanic Society of America (1)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The following is a four-part descriptive study of sixty-one hitherto unknown-to-exist Catalan-language cultural manuscripts dating from 1500 to the 1930s extant in the Library of the Hispanic Society of America in New York. This collection contains a considerable number of eighteenth-century poems in Catalan, works dealing with social history, the history of the trades, municipal documentation as well as personal correspondence, a unique 1705 medical treatise, in addition to dozens of Sardana musical scores. After a brief Introduction, the authors focus on the salient cultural virtues of manuscript HC 380/632, a fairly unitary poetic anthology of works penned in Barcelona during the latter two decades of the eighteenth century. It provides keen insights into the festive activities of the city's religious orders, as well into the daily occurrences of its secular world. All this in Catalan, a language that was supposed to have ceased to exist as the lingua franca of everyday communication during the regime of the Bourbon new order. The entire collection is an exciting new discovery of cultural texts to serve the needs of researchers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".