MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987496248 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.247

A multi-period optimization model for energy planning with CO2 emission considerations

2009· article· en· W1987496248 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tule Sirikitputtisak, H. Mirzaesmaeeli, Peter Douglas, Eric Croiset, Ali Elkamel, Murlidhar Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Procedia · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicEnergy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReduction (mathematics)ElectricityRetrofittingFlexibility (engineering)Greenhouse gasPurchasingKyoto ProtocolEnvironmental economicsFuel efficiencyLinear programmingComputer scienceOperations researchEngineeringMathematical optimizationOperations managementAutomotive engineeringEconomicsElectrical engineeringMathematicsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A multi-period optimal energy planning program for Ontario has been developed in mixed-integer non-linear programming using General Algebraic Modeling System, GAMS. The program applies both time-dependent and time-independent constraints. These include, but not limited to, construction time, fluctuation of fuel prices, and CO2 emission reduction target. It also offer flexibility of fuel balancing and fuel switching of the existing boilers and option purchasing of Carbon credit if the reduction target is not achievable. The objective function incorporates all these constraints as well as minimizes over all the cost of electricity and meets the projected electricity demand over a span of 14 years. Originally it was used for only two study cases which are the base case scenario for Ontario where no CO2 emission reduction target is applied and the 6% reduction case to meet the Kyoto Protocol; to reduce its CO2 emission to 6% below that of 1990. This project utilizes the program for various similar study cases and beyond. The Ontario’s study cases include different CO2 emission reduction targets ranging from 6% to 75% below 1990 levels by 2012. The overall cost of the electricity for different CO2 emission reduction targets increases linearly with slope of 1.3. Carbon capture and sequestration, retrofitting of the carbon capture and storage, and fuel switching are the main strategy in order to keep the cost of electricity relative low and satisfy the CO2 emission constraints. These results help us better understand the factors affecting the fleet’s structure. It may also help plan the energy direction of Ontario and perhaps serve as an example for other provinces, territories, states, and even countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.219
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy ProcediaSame topicEnergy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesFrench-language works237,207