Magnetic properties of Fe nanoclusters on Cu(111) studied with X‐ray magnetic circular dichroism
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The magnetisation and magnetic response of Fe nanoclusters are studied by temperature and density dependent in situ X‐ray magnetic circular dichroism after deposition onto Cu(111). The nanoclusters possess enhanced spin magnetic moments at low temperature, whereas no enhancement is found for the orbital moments. The analysis of magnetisation curves and the temperature dependent remnant magnetisation reveals that the individual magnetic anisotropy energies are distributed over a wide range of values, ranging from below to far above the value of bulk α ‐Fe. As a result, ferromagnetic response is obtained at ambient temperature, even though the nanocluster densities range well below percolation threshold. At higher cluster densities agglomeration and substrate mediated interaction increase the mean blocking temperature in the particle ensemble. The observed macroscopic magnetic in‐plane anisotropy derives from the average dipolar interactions between the nanoclusters. Single particle properties, substrate mediated coupling and dipolar interactions thus independently contribute to magnetic characteristics on equal footing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it